Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.

December 06 2016

durchzug
21:44
7406 47ae
via xkcd: Settling
Of course, "Number of times I've gotten to make a decision twice to know for sure how it would have turned out" is still at 0.
Reposted fromclifford clifford

November 28 2016

durchzug
21:09
Natürlich habe ich nicht das gemacht. Aber es reicht schon, wenn man für Unternehmen arbeitet, die zB. Produkte herstellen die Menschen abhängig machen und das auch Teil ihres Geschäftsmodells ist (zB. Glücksspiel, MMORPG-Hersteller, usw.).

Oder für Infrastruktur-Provider zu arbeiten, die aktiv und mit voller Absicht daran arbeiten die jeweilige Infrastruktur möglichst nicht auszubauen, sogar aktiv daran arbeiten dass sie eine zementierte Monopolstellung aufzubauen in der ein Machtungleichgewicht herrscht (zB. gängige Internet und Mobilfunkbetreiber).

Oder Firmen die auf einen Trend aufspringen um dann ein Produkt zu entwickeln, für was sie selbst eigentlich nicht ernsthaft stehen. Finde ich auch moralisch verwerflich.

Auch finde ich Firmen die Daten sammeln und diese gezielt an "Partner" hin und wieder abführen und daneben recht wenig in die originale Datensicherheit dieser Benutzerdaten investieren, moralisch verwerflich (zB. Facebook,  usw.)

Daneben die generelle Tendenz Dinge möglichst schnell rauszuhauen, möglichst ja nicht darüber nachdenken während man von "Kollegen" hört, dass das YAGNI ist und man daher ein Trottel ist.

Ich finde einen Großteil der IT in dieser Zeit eigentlich zum Vergessen in dieser Hinsicht.

Wie gesagt ich wäre Langzeitarbeitsloser.

November 24 2016

durchzug
18:48
Fefe hat auch die selbstsichere Arschloch-Mentalität die man dafür auch braucht.

Würde ich so handeln, wäre ich Langzeitarbeitsloser.

Langsam denke ich, dass ich mal über genau diesen Hügel drüber kommen kann, wo ich exakt so agieren KANN. Danke Sozialisation, danke Mitmenschen ihr seid auch nicht unschuldig.

November 22 2016

durchzug
19:14

November 19 2016

durchzug
21:27

Praxis

Egal wer man ist, egal was man macht. Das was man macht, was man praktiziert, bestimmt wer man ist. Die Anderen sehen nicht wer man wirklich ist, sie sehen nur das was man praktiziert.

Schöne Argument zählen nicht, solange sie nicht erlebt werden durch die Praxis desjenigen der sie äußert.

Die Tragik daran ist, dass man nicht immer eins ist mit seiner Praxis. Man nicht immer in Topform ist, man nicht immer das was man predigt auch lebt.

Verstummt man deswegen und zieht sich zurück von der sich dauernd ändernden Realität?

November 13 2016

durchzug
21:49
Offenheit, was für ein Konzept. Offensichtlich ganz ganz was neues. War wohl noch nie da.

October 27 2016

durchzug
19:20
Mich würde es nicht wundern, wenn man feststellen würde, dass es Menschen gibt, bei denen man eine genetische Anpassung festgestellt hat.

Welche es diesen erlaubt sich korrekt und geistreich in der Rede zu geben, obwohl das Hirnmaterial was dafür verantwortlich, unter normalen Umständen, wäre durch häufigen Alkoholkonsum schon längst abgetötet  wurde.

October 24 2016

durchzug
18:18
durchzug
18:07
8963 95c7 390
Fuck teamwork! In a better world, those who want to work alone and stay working alone for atleast most of the time can do that and be successful. Teamwork never ever gained me anything except a desire to numb me.

October 20 2016

durchzug
05:41
Let's name this what it is: bullshit. Gender neutral isn't the same as opposing "the opposite gender stereotype on your child".

My argumentation:
1. The first two pictures are neutral. Why is a girl in an overall supposed to be "boyish"? Imagine that girl grows up, grows some nice boobs, turns out to be beautiful and works as a mechanic. Isn't that one of those pictures you sometimes see in movies, the picture of the sexy mechanic girl? I never ever saw that people are associating those movie characters as "cross dressers". But when you apply that to children you are "imposing the opposite sex" on your little snowflake. Bullshit!

2. The second picture is a boy wearing normal boyish associated clothing and wearing a pinkish sweater. Pink isn't a color of girls, blue isn't a color of boys. There seems to be phases of using one color for boys and another for girls and also phases where it was fully or partly reversed. (Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_historical_sources_for_pink_and_blue_as_gender_signifiers#Ambiguous)
Secondly imagine that boy also grows up and
goes to the gym every second day all year,
maybe takes a good dose of steroids and stil has
this clothing preference. I don't think you would
want to pull that same joke on that guy, he could
break your neck. So when a boy isn't strong and is still weak, he is imposed something when he wears
a pink sweater? I mean when he doesn't like it, then yes that's true, but seeing just a picture of a boy wearing something which is associated with girls at our current time doesn't say anything about imposing or not imposing. There are picture where you can say that clearly, but this series of pictures aren't. Bullshit!

3. The third picture is a boy in a pink tutu. Looks more like that boy wanted be a ballet dancer and chose a pink tutu. And mother said: "okay honey" and fulfilled that little wish. You could interpret it also the other way. But from the picture you don't see it. Children aren't yours, they aren't your property. Imposing the gender of what they are supposed to be on them is also imposing. The way how you talk with them, how you interact with them is imposing YOUR world view on them. You can't interact with them without doing that, that's just impossible. It's on the same level as thinking that you can be neutral, without bias is also impossible. So, this is too bullshit

September 30 2016

durchzug
17:50
Ingenieur = Steigbügelhalter

September 29 2016

durchzug
05:59
Hass entsteht, wenn tiefe und lang andauernde Verletzungen nicht abgewehrt und/oder bestraft werden können. Hass ist somit eine Kombination aus Vernunft und Gefühl. Die Vernunft ruft nach dem Ende der Verletzung und nach einer Bestrafung des Quälenden.

(Quelle: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hass )
— Wikipedia
Reposted bye-gruppecygenb0ckshadowsbollabollamangoeAlecta

September 21 2016

durchzug
17:33
"The Washington Post" should be a new synonym for asshole and/or douchebag.

September 14 2016

durchzug
23:17
Enforcing the 4 freedoms of free software ensures, that something stays free. Why does Stallman be a dick about and being unable to explain it in non-douchebaggy terms?

Well, I guess first he is a socially retarded person, so he can't see his  problems of stating his cause. And even when he does, he doesn't know how to fix it or doesn't care.

Second point is that law is an asshole, the FSF would, I guess, love to have a short license, but because of law it can't and it still wants that the license actually counts something in court.

Btw. calling people who identify themselves as liberal but use a big "BUT" in their viewpoint isn't that self defying? And also not correct to call those people? Maybe but-ists is a nice term? So that they can have their own logo a nice but.

September 12 2016

durchzug
12:09
The freelancer daycycle
durchzug
12:08
Reposted fromFlau Flau viaclifford clifford

September 11 2016

durchzug
06:53
Life basically just sucks, mostly. It seems like there has to be a better way; we can’t be meant to be miserable all the time. There has to be some ultimate purpose to existence.

(Source: https://meaningness.com/stances-are-unstable )
durchzug
06:36
If you can let go of the grandiosity that leads you to imagine that some special task awaits you, and the false hope that getting enough of what you want would make life satisfactory, you can be useful and enjoy yourself.

(Source: https://meaningness.com/misunderstanding-meaningness-makes-many-miserable
)

September 09 2016

durchzug
08:21
PHP benutzen um eine Webseite zu bauen ist wie wenn man sich im Winter anbrunst, damit es so schön warm wird.

August 29 2016

durchzug
18:54

English will not be an official EU language after Brexit, says senior MEP

Could that mean that the babilonic battle of the languages are again open? Atleast in the EU just to differentiate themselves in opposition to Britain? Quote:

"The Commission has already started using French and German more often in its external communications, as a symbolic move after Britain voted to leave the EU last Thursday, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Meanwhile, the president of the regional council of Tuscany, Eugenio Giani, called for Italian to become one of the official languages of the EU. “We have not defended … our language as we should have, both on the European continent and in the world,” Giani said following the British referendum result."

Reposted bynaich naich
Older posts are this way If this message doesn't go away, click anywhere on the page to continue loading posts.
Could not load more posts
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...
Just a second, loading more posts...
You've reached the end.

Don't be the product, buy the product!

Schweinderl